The Death of Paper Money

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

Ebay is offering a well-thumbed volume of “Dying of Money: Lessons of the Great German and American Inflations” at a starting bid of $699 (shipping free.. thanks a lot).

The crucial passage comes in Chapter 17 entitled “Velocity”. Each big inflation — whether the early 1920s in Germany, or the Korean and Vietnam wars in the US — starts with a passive expansion of the quantity money. This sits inert for a surprisingly long time. Asset prices may go up, but latent price inflation is disguised. The effect is much like lighter fuel on a camp fire before the match is struck.

People’s willingness to hold money can change suddenly for a “psychological and spontaneous reason” , causing a spike in the velocity of money. It can occur at lightning speed, over a few weeks. The shift invariably catches economists by surprise. They wait too long to drain the excess money.

“Velocity took an almost right-angle turn upward in the summer of 1922,” said Mr O Parsson. Reichsbank officials were baffled. They could not fathom why the German people had started to behave differently almost two years after the bank had already boosted the money supply. He contends that public patience snapped abruptly once people lost trust and began to “smell a government rat”.

Some might smile at the Bank of England “surprise” at the recent the jump in Brtiish inflation. Across the Atlantic, Fed critics say the rise in the US monetary base from $871bn to $2,024bn in just two years is an incendiary pyre that will ignite as soon as US money velocity returns to normal.

Morgan Stanley expects bond carnage as this catches up with the Fed, predicting that yields on US Treasuries will rocket to 5.5pc. This has not happened so far. 10-year yields have fallen below 3pc, and M2 velocity has remained at historic lows of 1.72.

As a signed-up member of the deflation camp, I think the Bank and the Fed are right to keep their nerve and delay the withdrawal of stimulus — though that case is easier to make in the US where core inflation has dropped to the lowest since the mid 1960s. But fact that O Parsson’s book is suddenly in demand in elite banking circles is itself a sign of the sort of behavioral change that can become self-fulfilling.

As it happens, another book from the 1970s entitled “When Money Dies: the Nightmare of The Weimar Hyper-Inflation” has just been reprinted. Written by former Tory MEP Adam Fergusson — endorsed by Warren Buffett as a must-read — it is a vivid account drawn from the diaries of those who lived through the turmoil in Germany, Austria, and Hungary as the empires were broken up.

Near civil war between town and country was a pervasive feature of this break-down in social order. Large mobs of half-starved and vindictive townsmen descended on villages to seize food from farmers accused of hoarding. The diary of one young woman described the scene at her cousin’s farm.

“In the cart I saw three slaughtered pigs. The cowshed was drenched in blood. One cow had been slaughtered where it stood and the meat torn from its bones. The monsters had slit the udder of the finest milch cow, so that she had to be put out of her misery immediately. In the granary, a rag soaked with petrol was still smouldering to show what these beasts had intended,” she wrote.

Grand pianos became a currency or sorts as pauperized members of the civil service elites traded the symbols of their old status for a sack of potatoes and a side of bacon. There is a harrowing moment when each middle-class families first starts to undertand that its gilt-edged securities and War Loan will never recover. Irreversible ruin lies ahead. Elderly couples gassed themselves in their apartments.

Foreigners with dollars, pounds, Swiss francs, or Czech crowns lived in opulence. They were hated. “Times made us cynical. Everybody saw an enemy in everybody else,” said Erna von Pustau, daughter of a Hamburg fish merchant.

Great numbers of people failed to see it coming. “My relations and friends were stupid. They didn’t understand what inflation meant. Our solicitors were no better. My mother’s bank manager gave her appalling advice,” said one well-connected woman.

“You used to see the appearance of their flats gradually changing. One remembered where there used to be a picture or a carpet, or a secretaire. Eventually their rooms would be almost empty. Some of them begged — not in the streets — but by making casual visits. One knew too well what they had come for.”

Corruption became rampant. People were stripped of their coat and shoes at knife-point on the street. The winners were those who — by luck or design — had borrowed heavily from banks to buy hard assets, or industrial conglomerates that had issued debentures. There was a great transfer of wealth from saver to debtor, though the Reichstag later passed a law linking old contracts to the gold price. Creditors clawed back something.

A conspiracy theory took root that the inflation was a Jewish plot to ruin Germany. The currency became known as “Judefetzen” (Jew- confetti), hinting at the chain of events that would lead to Kristallnacht a decade later.

While the Weimar tale is a timeless study of social disintegration, it cannot shed much light on events today. The final trigger for the 1923 collapse was the French occupation of the Ruhr, which ripped a great chunk out of German industry and set off mass resistance.

Lloyd George suspected that the French were trying to precipitate the disintegration of Germany by sponsoring a break-away Rhineland state (as indeed they were). For a brief moment rebels set up a separatist government in Dusseldorf. With poetic justice, the crisis recoiled against Paris and destroyed the franc.

The Carthaginian peace of Versailles had by then poisoned everything. It was a patriotic duty not to pay taxes that would be sequestered for reparation payments to the enemy. Influenced by the Bolsheviks, Germany had become a Communist cauldron. partakists tried to take Berlin. Worker `soviets’ proliferated. Dockers and shipworkers occupied police stations and set up barricades in Hamburg. Communist Red Centuries fought deadly street battles with right-wing militia.

Nostalgics plotted the restoration of Bavaria’s Wittelsbach monarchy and the old currency, the gold-backed thaler. The Bremen Senate issued its own notes tied to gold. Others issued currencies linked to the price of rye.

This is not a picture of America, or Britain, or Europe in 2010. But we should be careful of embracing the opposite and overly-reassuring assumption that this is a mild replay of Japan’s Lost Decade, that is to say a slow and largely benign slide into deflation as debt deleveraging exerts its discipline.

Japan was the world’s biggest external creditor when the Nikkei bubble burst twenty years ago. It had a private savings rate of 15pc of GDP. The Japanese people have gradually cut this rate to 2pc, cushioning the effects of the long slump. The Anglo-Saxons have no such cushion.

There is a clear temptation for the West to extricate itself from the errors of the Greenspan asset bubble, the Brown credit bubble, and the EMU sovereign bubble by stealth default through inflation. But that is a danger for later years. First we have the deflation shock of lives. Then — and only then — will central banks go to far and risk losing control over their printing experiment as velocity takes off. One problem at a time please.

Article Source: HERE



A bankrupt BP will be worse than Lehman fiasco

By Jim Sinclair

The BP crisis in the Gulf of Mexico has rightfully been analysed (mostly) from the ecological perspective. People’s lives and livelihoods are in grave danger. But that focus has equally masked something very serious from a financial perspective, in my opinion, that could lead to an acceleration of the crisis brought about by the Lehman implosion.

People are seriously underestimating how much liquidity in the global financial world is dependent on a solvent BP. BP extends credit – through trading and finance. They extend the amounts, quality and duration of credit a bank could only dream of. The Gold community should think about the financial muscle behind a company with 100+ years of proven oil and gas reserves.

Think about that in comparison with what a bank, with few tangible assets, (truly, not allegedly) possesses (no wonder they all started trading for a living!). Then think about what happens if BP goes under. This is no bank. With proven reserves and wells in the ground, equity in fields all over the planet, in terms of credit quality and credit provision – nothing can match an oil major. God only knows how many assets around the planet are dependent on credit and finance extended from BP. It is likely to dwarf any banking entity in multiples.

And at the heart of it all are those dreadful OTC derivatives again! Banks try and lean on major oil companies because they have exactly the kind of credit-worthiness that they themselves lack. In fact, major oil companies, conversely, spend large amounts of time both denying Banks credit and trying to get Bank risk off of their books in their trading operations.

Oil companies have always mistrusted bank creditworthiness and have largely considered the banking industry a bad financial joke. Banks plead with oil companies to let them trade beyond one year in duration. Banks even used to do losing trades with oil companies simply to get them on their trading register… a foot in the door so that they could subsequently beg for an extension in credit size and duration.

For the banks, all trading was based on what the early derivatives giant, Bankers Trust, named their trading system: RAROC – or, Risk Adjusted Return on Credit. Trading is a function of credit bequeathed, mixed with the risk of the (trading) position. As trading and credit are intertwined, we might do well to remember what might happen to global liquidity and markets if BP suffers what many believe to be its deserved fate of bankruptcy. The Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) has already been and will be further undermined by BP’s distress. They are one of the only “hard asset” entities backing up this so-called exchange.

If BP does go bust (regardless of whether it is deserved), and even if it is just badly wounded and the US entity is allowed to fail, the long-term OTC derivatives in the oil, refined products and natural gas markets that get nullified could be catastrophic. These will kick-back into the banking system. BP is the primary player on the long-end of the energy curve. How exposed are Goldman sub J. Aron, Morgan Stanley and JPM? Probably hugely. Now credit has been cut to BP. Counter-parties will not accept their name beyond one year in duration. This is unheard of. A giant is on the ropes. If he falls, the very earth may shake as he hits the ground.

As we are beginning to see, the Western pension structure, financial trading and global credit are all inter-twined. BP is central to this, as a massive supplier of what many believe(d) to be AAA credit. So while we see banks roll over and die, and sovereign entities begin to falter… we now have a major oil company on the verge of going under. Another leg of the global economic “chair” is being viciously kicked out from under us. Ecological damage is not just an eco-event on its isolated own. It has been added to the list of man-made disasters jeopardizing the world economy. The price tag and resultant knock-on effects of a BP failure could easily be equal to that of a Lehman, if not more. It is surely, at the very least, Enron x10.

All the counter-party risk associated with the current BP situation means the term curve of the global oil trade has likely shut down. Here we have yet another credit-based event causing a lock-up in markets that will now impede trade and commerce. It looks like an exact replication of the 2008 credit market seizure could ensue all over again – and it could probably be a lot worse. The world is in a far more delicate state now.

Although never really discussed, the world is highly reliant on BPs provision of long-term credit to many core industries. Who makes good on all the outstanding paper that so many smaller oil, gas and electricity companies, airlines, shipping companies, local bus, railway and transportation networks that rely on BPs creditworthiness and performance for? It doesn’t take a genius to figure out how this could all unwind. If BP has to be bailed-out, like a bank, the system will have to print even more unimaginable amounts of money.

The market, intellectually lazy and slow to realization, as it often is, probably has not woken up to it yet – but the BP crisis could unleash damage similar to the banking crisis. A BP failure through bankruptcy could make Lehman look small in comparison, and shake the financial house of cards we live in even more severely. If the implicit danger of the possibilities imbedded in such an event doesn’t make an individual now turn towards gold at full speed, it is likely that nothing will.

Courtesy: http://www.oilprice.com & http://www.commodityonline.com



Financial Reform Coming Closer to Reality

The US Congress is on the verge of passing the most sweeping financial regulatory reform bill since the Great Depression and the result of its passage will affect every investor in the US. Fundamental financial reform is necessary in order to bring back stability in our economic system. There is no sane reason why the entire marketplace should trade as if it was completely made up of penny stock securities. Institutions that make significant contributions to global economies should fulfill their societal responsibilities as stable and mature institutions and not imagine themselves to be rapid growth profit-seeking start-ups. To some extent, pressure from shareholders is as much to blame as the management of firms. When financial institutions fail the whole system is put at risk and countless livelihoods and firms can be thrown into jeopardy.

Globally, financial crashes have happened once every eight to ten years since the repeal of Glass-Steagall. The repeals purpose was to make US banks more competitive with their counterparties in other areas of the world, however the flood gates were opened up when the law was turned over by Congress. The critics of the Financial Overhaul Bill are wrong to say that it’s “window dressing” because every bill can be considered “window dressing”. It’s not the bill itself that ultimately changes the environment but the enforcement of the bill. If agencies fail to act, as they have been doing for the past decade, then this bill is essentially not worth the paper it has been written on, but if agencies renew their sense of purpose and commitment to protecting the American people then this bill could actually mean something to the United States.

The following is a short summary of some of the main elements of the bill:

  1. Establishes New Regulatory Authority: FDIC can seize and break up troubled financial firms and other financial firms will have to pay for it — This may encourage financial institutions to not permit other financial institutions to take risky bets
  2. Financial Stability Council setup: Council would recommend ongoing changes to the system to the Fed —The council seems like a body that will try to keep up with a changing financial system and environment, but purely depends on the competency of the members of the council.
  3. Volcker Rule: Banks would be allowed to invest up to 3% of tier 1 capital in hedge funds or private equity firms — This action will do little if anything to change the conflict of interest that exists between banks and trading operations.
  4. Derivatives Oversight: Derivatives will be regulated and would require clearinghouse approval — Brings long–needed transparency into this marketplace.
  5. Consumer Agency Created: The Consumer Financial Protection Agency would have rulemaking and enforcement power through the Fed over banks and non-bank financial firms — Meant to make sure the average consumer isn’t being cheated by legal jargon or fine print.
  6. Oversight Updates: Enables the Fed to supervise the largest and most complex financial firms to monitor potential systemic risks — Gives the Fed broader authority to monitor potential risks.
  7. Bank Capital Classification: Trust–preferred securities would no longer be treated as tier 1 capital unless the bank has less than $15 billion in assets — Eliminates banks from treating debt like securities as tier 1 capital.
  8. Bank Fee Implementation: A fee on financial institutions with more than $50 million would be imposed and hedge funds with more than $10 billion in order to pay for this program — Finally the banks have to pay a fee.
  9. Mortgage underwriting: Standards will be introduced that will help lenders verify that a borrower is financially capable of servicing and amortizing their loan — This protects honest and unknowledgable home buyers from lender and buyer abuse.
  10. Bank Loan Conflict of Interests: Banks would have to keep 5% of the credit risk on their books — This should align the interests of the bank with the debt investor base.
  11. Credit Agencies: New quasi–government agency would be established to address conflicts of interest in the credit rating business model. Would also enable investors to sue credit rating agencies for knowingly and recklessly failing to conduct an investigation — The conflicts of interest in the credit rating agency business model is inherent in the industry and needs to be corrected in order avoid inaccurate ratings.
  12. Corporate Governance Democratized: Will give investors access to a proxy to nominate directors and give shareholders a non–binding vote on executive pay and severance packages —A non–binding vote will give the investor base some clarity and an obvious time to express confidence or no–confidence in the management team, however non-binding does nothing to enact the shareholder requests.
  13. Insurance Regulation: A new regulatory office of insurance will be established to monitor the insurance industry — The task of this office will be to monitor risk in an industry that monitors risk.


The Spill

After 5 weeks, the BP Gulf of Mexico spill has become the worst man-made disaster in the history of the United States and its affects will likely have a lasting affect for years to come. No doubt, the damage has been severe on the environment and many scientists expect that the situation is worse than currently estimated. As a result of the spill, the Gulf States are likely to experience a further economic downturn as the spill has brought their vibrant seafood industry to a standstill and a six-month moratorium has been put into place on off-shore drilling. This avoidable accident has further exposed the lack of accountability, dishonesty in the corporate world and the need to diversify away from oil.

The BP spill has been deeply saddening and disturbing; hopefully we will recover from it. However, now there is an even greater opportunity for the United States to accelerate the shift away from oil to alternative technologies. If the Gulf States have the foresight to recognize that one of their largest industries is holding them hostage, they might want to diversify away from those businesses and incentivize businesses to create green jobs and manufacturing plants. The United States needs new technology and it needs to be manufactured and installed everywhere, not just in 4-5 progressive states.

In addition to the acceleration in green energy and technology, other industries will see a boom from this as well, which includes insurance brokerage servicers and oilfield service equipment providers. Insurance brokerage servicers are processing companies that process insurance claims and generate a fee off of each claim, if a disaster occurs the insurance brokerage servicers typically raise their fees as they experience a heavy volume of claims. The oilfield service equipment (OFS) industry could stand to gain if new regulations require relief wells to be drilled simultaneously with producing ones and more equipment is needed in order to cover worst-case scenarios.

The increase in insurance costs and the need for more OFS equipment will also drive up the price of oil, which will further accelerate the demand for alternative technologies as the main obstacle for the alternative energy business is the affordability of their product relative to traditional sources. When traditional energy prices rise, more attention is paid to alternative energy as businesses and consumers are given more choices at comparable prices.

There is no thought in my mind that tells me that Americans shouldn’t change their energy consumption habits and behaviors and really take a look at the medium to long term affects of their present decisions and actions. The BP spill is a terrible event that has once again shattered our confidence in corporations and regulators and I hope that this is a wake up call to an opportunity to get serious about our future. Unfortunately, there are no worse circumstances for this opportunity to come about.



Optimist or a Pessimist

I prefer to not think of myself as an optimist or a pessimist. If I were to give myself a label, it would be a realist. Looking at the economies around the world over the last 3 tumultuous weeks, I see some sick ones in Europe and healthy/healthier ones in other parts of the world such as North America, Latin America and Asia. It’s true that the US still has a long way to go before we can look back and say that we have recovered from uncertainty and that we are now on a stable path forward, but there is no doubt that we have come a long way.

Let’s take a quick look back at what has happened in the last year domestically. The US came out of a very deep and downward spiraling recession with the help of the government’s injection of capital; despite the last 3 weeks, the market has seen a recovery, comprehensive health care reform was passed and comprehensive financial reform has made its way to the congressional conference committee, which is the next step on the way to the President’s desk.

The European picture is not nearly as impressive as the United States’ because despite a united currency, Europe is not a united community and until recently they were abhorrent to taking bold steps. It’s no secret that Europe has been in trouble for a very long while and although the European meltdown was catalyzed by events in the US, most of the blame can be placed on Europeans, themselves. Europe has had systemic issues developing over decades and they are actually simpler to look at than you might think. In this blog, let’s look at two factors: 1) Population growth and 2) Economic growth. Population growth in Europe has been declining in some countries for the last two decades, which puts an especially burdensome responsibility on younger generations when they are forced to pay (through increased taxes) for the cozy pensions and benefits of their parents & grandparents. As time progresses, the burden becomes larger and the cost of living becomes more expensive, which further reduces the desire to have more children as it is so expensive (this is purely a financial perspective) and thus the cycle perpetuates and population growth further declines. The second factor is economic growth and the economic engine of Europe hasn’t seen significant growth in decades and that’s partly because of the mandatory vacations that are assigned to its citizens, which from the perspective of living standards isn’t bad. However, a limited work week and more time off does dampen productivity and hurts economic growth because large orders may not be completed by customer desired deadlines and may choose to order products from another region as a result. Actions taken over the last week to shore up nations within Europe sends a signal that Europe may be capable of decisive action and perhaps Europeans will wise up to their real problems and find real solutions.

Let’s turn our attention to another important event of the past 3 weeks: Financial Reform. The financial reform bill in Congress was crafted in order to bring more accountability to an industry that has for too long been able to hide the risk that it poses to the global economic system. The intent of the bill is to reduce the risk of another financial meltdown that could jeopardize our economic and fiscal institutions. Since the 1980s, markets have been more turbulent than at any other time since the Great Depression, with a financial meltdown happening every 8 to 10 years. Right now, it is too early to decide whether this will work or not.

It is undeniable that we have come a long way from where we were 2 years ago, but it is absolutely essential that the US protects the stability and reliability of business in America and the American economy. There will always be bears and bulls of the market and the side with the most representatives touting their beliefs on the airwaves will tend to tip the public mood in the economy.



Contagion Part II

The US economy grew at 3.2 percent in the first quarter, which is a good sign that the US economy is experiencing a strong recovery. The first quarter in 2010 also marked the third consecutive quarter of positive GDP growth in the American economy. Looking forward, it is important to note that one of the main factors behind the growth rate is the 3.6% increase in consumer spending, a growth rate not seen since early 2007. This is more of a positive sign for the US economy than increased inventories because it demonstrates that the US consumer is returning to a more normalized behavior. However, although these are positive signs, investors must be cautious with their decisions and do what they can to mitigate the risk of another downturn

Turning our attention away from the US and back to the bigger global picture, we must again re-visit the story of Greece, or rather the tragedy of Greece. As I mentioned a few weeks ago, I believed that there would be an IMF/EU combination rescue package for Greece in order to stop contagion from occurring. Over the last week, it may appear to many that the typically slow response of Europe might have not stopped this sovereign epidemic. The S&P cut Greece, Portugal and Spain’s debt rating and it seems all but likely that another European country is in S&P’s sites. Although, it can be argued that the ratings agency made unwarranted downgrades as no new material information released over last week, it still has an affect on bond yields and can dramatically increase the cost of borrowing for sovereign countries.

The current plan under review by European ministers and the IMF will enable Greece to draw on more than 100 billion euros in loans from the IMF and eurozone. There is a fear that this action, albeit sufficient, is not enough to stop the spread of fear in the markets. Now, with Spain’s downgrade and their ridiculously high unemployment of 20%, they will find it extremely difficult to survive without a bailout, as the cost of their debt increases, interest payments will crowd out money available for government services. The political consequences are tremendous and the ability to pay down debt reduces everyday as populations strike or vow to elect politicians that ignore their fiscal well-being and maintain public services. This populous action only hurts the country’s ability to pay back debt as less people work and less taxes are paid. Sovereign nations are not like companies, they cannot file for chapter 11 and there is only a debt component to their capital structure. In good times and in bad, countries look to raise money by auctioning bonds while they simultaneously seek to lower tax revenues and reduce future cash flows because it is politically popular. Tough decisions are needed by the people of countries around the world to get themselves out of a potentially disastrous situation. It makes sense to borrow in bad times in order to give a jolt to the economy, but it does not make sense to place huge debt burdens on a country during good times as sovereign debt crises will be inevitable during downturns.

All nations that are debt laden have to address their bloating budget deficits before the markets gang up and essentially force a default. In addition to addressing budget concerns, the markets, companies and countries need to be more transparent with their finances so that people aren’t surprised or infuriated by decisions and actions made under the cloak of secrecy.



Sleeping on a good investment

The years between 2008 and early 2010 will long be remembered around the globe as the period of the Great Recession. However, in the US it will be remembered for more than just that: the election of the first African-American President, the passing of monumental legislation such as the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the START treaty for nuclear non-proliferation, and the moment in time that Americans began to take control of their spending.

It is no secret that consumer spending in the US grinded to a halt over the last two years from its peak in 2007 and although it has made some ground in recent months, it is still at historically low levels. But for investors there are signs of hope and knowing those signs will provide investors with opportunities of prosperity.

Consumer spending is driven by a few factors, but is largely dependent on the employment levels of the population and consumer confidence. The two factors are almost inextricably linked, as during periods of high unemployment, the consumer confidence index trends lower. The key to making a good investment in the consumer products industry is by buying in at the bottom or the moment the industry is starting to see a turnaround.

A general shift in consumer spending has occurred as a result of the dramatic shocks that American consumers felt over the last two years. Consumers are now looking at best value and giving more weight to quality in their decision process of making a purchase. A unique industry that is experiencing promising signs of return is the bedding industry, specifically the specialty bedding industry.

The bedding industry’s fundamentals essentially make this a good and safe consumer product investment in normal cyclical markets. The fundamentals that drive demand are demographics and pent-up replacement. Naturally, a growing population will require more and more mattresses and the medical benefit of getting better sleep has helped shift consumers to more specialty (and higher end) sleep surfaces. I would expect that as housing sales begin to increase again and unemployment levels fall this will be one of the industries in consumer products that will make a stronger than expected recovery.



Turning the Bad into Good

As the US economy begins to lift itself up out of the Great Recession, there will be many public equity offerings that will accompany the rise in GDP. Public equity offerings are the easiest (and cheapest) way for companies to raise capital for expansion, acquisitions or sponsor/debt pay down. Some of these equity issuances will be first time participants and some will be making secondary offerings and some will be returning as reorganized companies emerging from bankruptcy.

According to JP Morgan, “since 2007, 426 public companies filed for bankruptcy, representing $1.2 trillion in assets.” Not all reorganizations will successfully emerge from bankruptcy as healthy companies and return to the public equity markets, in fact, many will not and there business units or assets will be sold off in order for senior secured lenders to recover value. However, expect that companies such as General Motors will tap into the public equity markets once again over the course of this year and the next.

Determining whether to invest in the offering of a company that has emerged out of bankruptcy has to be on the basis of prudent analysis. There are essential factors that assist investors in forming an investment thesis on whether a reorganized company will perform well. The investor should be analyzing a “combination of cyclical and secular factors”, debt reduction, asset structure shifts and management changes.

A successful reorganized company has the following characteristics:

  1. Debt reduction of at least 50%
  2. Management changes
  3. EV/EBITDA is less than 5.0x – which is a discount to the S&P average
  4. Company is in one of the top 5 sectors based on performance following reorganizations (Telecom, Materials, Consumer Staples, Utilities and Consumer Discretionary).
  5. Cyclical factors that sent the company into reorganization are no longer present.

The first few months following an emergence from bankruptcy and public offering is the narrow timetable for when the investor should decide to invest in a reorganized company in order to maximize return. During this short time period the company will typically experience specifics items that depress their stock price – information access will be limited because of the lack of regular updates; investor skepticism is often observed within the first few months of going public as mainstream investors typically view reorganized companies poorly; lack of research will further limit the information out there as coverage tends not resume for at least one year; and there is expected to be an initial drive down in prices as lenders are quick to sell their holdings to realize a nominal return. A prudent approach could lead to successful returns, which history has shown us to be true during the last recession and rebound of the early 2000s, where the first 12 month gains of publicly traded reorganizations averaged 84% in returns (relative to the S&P).




Sign up today!